Search for: "Amicus Curiae the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Arbitration Unconscionability Case: Rent-A-Center v. Jackson
22 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council in Support of Petitioner Brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in Support of Petitioner Brief for American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations in Support of Respondent Brief for Professional Arbitrators and Arbitration Scholars in Support of Respondent Brief for Lawyers’… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Opinion below (2d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation et al. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Opinion below (2nd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation et al. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
Several organizations such as National League of Cities, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and the Washington Legal Foundation, filed amici curiae Briefs The central players in this case include the Graham County water district from North Carolina and a former secretary at Graham County water district. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Opinion below (10th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (in support of petitioner) Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation (in support of petitioner) Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce (in support of petitioner) Docket: 08-1222 Title: Boy Scouts of America, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
(in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America (in support of petitioners) [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
(in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America (in support of petitioners) Cases involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 08-987 Title: Campa v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 12:29 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Supplemental brief of petitioner Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of California Retailers Association (in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:11 pm
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America (in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (in support of petitioners) __________________ Docket: 07-1295 Case name: Lewis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:03 pm
Members have more influence over what PLAC says in its briefs than non-members.United States Chamber of Commerce: The Chamber is interested in is all issues of broad importance to the business community - tort and product liability litigation among them. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:00 pm
The following applications for permission to file an amicus/amici curiae brief in support of defendants/appellants/cross-respondents Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al. are granted: (1) Employers Group et al., (2) Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, (3) Retail Industry Leaders Association, (4) California Employment Law Council, and (5) Civil Justice Association of California. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
The opinion italicized the phrase in the statute which stated: "the employer shall pay the employee one additional hour of pay at the employee's regular rate of compensation for each work day that the meal or rest period is not provided. [read post]
