Search for: "Andrews v. Time, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 1,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2022, 3:30 pm by Paul Willetts
The obligation of a terminated employee in mitigation is to seek “comparable employment”, which typically is employment that is comparable in status, hours and remuneration to the position held at the time of dismissal: Carter v. 1657593 Ontario Inc., 2015 ONCA 823, at para. 6. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:10 pm
At the time, Patent Docs provided a detailed report of the decision and its implications. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:58 pm by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterAnd the converse, says the Ninth, saves nothing, reports Michael Atkins: On June 11, the Ninth Circuit upheld the Western District’s award of attorney’s fees on the false designation of origin claim in Derek Andrew, Inc. v. [read post]
Justice Gorsuch, in a dissenting opinion joined by Justice Sotomayor, expressed strong disagreement with the majority’s interpretation of Section 315(b) as “another step down the road of ceding core judicial powers to agency officials and leaving the disposition of private rights and liberties to bureaucratic mercy” (Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Indeed, this was the first time that the Board provided a real-world example of a claim-amendment hypothetical described in the June 11, 2013 decision from the Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:32 pm
And the converse, says the Ninth, saves nothing, reports Michael Atkins: On June 11, the Ninth Circuit upheld the Western District's  award of attorney's fees on the false designation  of origin claim in Derek Andrew, Inc. v. [read post]