Search for: "Anthony Lanham"
Results 21 - 40
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2017, 4:19 pm
’” In sum, today’s decision declaring the Lanham Act’s disparagement clause unconstitutional reaffirms the First Am [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
This is the big fight over the Lanham Act’s disparagement clause and its effect on the Asian-American rock band called The Slants. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:58 am
Tam) involved an interpretation of the “disparagement clause” in the 1946 Lanham Act, which U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:50 am
Breyer; but a concurring opinion by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 3:46 am
When Justice Anthony Kennedy characterized his position as being that the “First Amendment protects absolutely outrageous speech insofar as trademarks are concerned,” Connell agreed that the statement was “correct. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:25 pm
(Photo by: Anthony Pidgeon/Redferns) Background As we’ve previously reported, the case centers on Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act which prohibits the registration of disparaging trademarks. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:25 pm
(Photo by: Anthony Pidgeon/Redferns) Background As we’ve previously reported, the case centers on Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act which prohibits the registration of disparaging trademarks. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
(Anthony Pidgeon/Redferns) Federal trademark law lets people register their trademarks, which gives them various legal remedies for stopping others’ infringement of those trademarks. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the Court, explained: Lanham Act suits take[ ] advantage of synergies among multiple methods of regulation. . . . [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the Court, explained: Lanham Act suits take[ ] advantage of synergies among multiple methods of regulation. . . . [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 12:45 pm
(Photo by: Anthony Pidgeon/Redferns) (credit: Courtesy The Slants) An Asian-American rock band called The Slants has taken a legal fight over its name all the way to an appeals court, resulting in a major decision over trademark rights. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 12:48 pm
Defendants counterclaimed for abuse of process against WNC and its principals Anthony Scott ("Scott"), Tamara McCracken Scott ("Ms. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:11 am
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:40 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:29 am
This, POM believed, violated a key principle of the Lanham Act-- the primary trade mark federal statute in the USA-- relating to false advertising.Coca Cola argued that they were allowed to describe the drink as they did, since their label complied with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:00 pm
Justice Anthony Kennedy found no conflict between the FDA's authority to ban misleading labels and the right of competitors like POM Wonderful to sue for the harm arising from the consumer deception that resulted. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:10 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
First up is Justice Anthony M. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:27 pm
Predictably enough, Justice Ginsburg asked him why the Patent Act provision on fees should be interpreted differently from the identically worded Lanham Act provision – referring to the Noxell Corp. v. [read post]
