Search for: "Any and All Unknown Claimants of Interest" Results 21 - 40 of 343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2010, 2:55 am by INFORRM
No prior notice had been given to any interested media organisations and the judge felt the application was more an attempt to protect Terry’s reputation and the financial interests of his commercial sponsors than to protect privacy. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am by INFORRM
Of course, it will add something to the substance and newsworthiness of the story that the police are investigating the claimant, but it seems to me that it would be tipping the scales too far in favour of the media to hold that not only the name of the claimant, but the details of the allegations against him, can normally be published as part of a story free of any right in the claimant to sue for defamation just because the general subject matter of the story is… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:50 am by Rosalind English
AMP v Persons unknown - read judgment If you lose your mobile phone with highly confidential and private information on it, all may  not be lost. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
The claimants suspected the defendant and sought an injunction prohibiting the defendant and unknown persons from disclosing the information to the first claimant’s wife and his adult children from a previous marriage. [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:11 am by Peter Vodola
(ii) specified that any future claimants with claims arising from purported liens in the Assets could bring those claims against only the sale proceeds, and (iii) enjoined such future claimants from asserting those claims against the Assets or the Purchaser . . . . [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:22 am
In any event, sometimes the ALJ will make an offer to find a claimant disabled, but the back benefits due to you will be calculated from a later date. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Jag
They cited the case of McNally (citation unknown, sorry!) [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Jag
They cited the case of McNally (citation unknown, sorry!) [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
It is that he has treated the question of public interest as an all-or-nothing matter; either there is public interest or there is none. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:57 am by J
Moreover, because the injunctions are usually sought against “persons unknown” there are rarely, if ever, any represented defendants. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:57 am by J
Moreover, because the injunctions are usually sought against “persons unknown” there are rarely, if ever, any represented defendants. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:41 am by Eleonora Rosati
" Thanks so much Mirko for this thorough review of yet another interesting decision from Germany! [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
In the case of a successful defence of common law and statutory qualified privilege, a claimant has no means of vindicating his reputation at all. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
There is nothing in the material before me to indicate any sufficient basis for a defence of truth or public interest. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The existence of the associated recordings later came to light and the Defendant gave three sets of undertakings, in return for financial payments, that he would deliver up all copies of the footage to the Claimant and not seek any further monetary payment. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
It is denied that these were private matters as alleged or at all… [10](iii)(b) ‘It is denied that the information contained in the Article was not a matter of legitimate public interest, or that it was unrelated to the First Claimant’s professional career as a sportsman. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
In the recent case of Terry (previously ‘LNS’) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) the court addressed the inter-relationship between two principles: the principle that the court may grant an interim injunction to restrain a threatened misuse of private information where the claimant can show that his claim is (at least) more likely than not to succeed, and the rule in Bonnard v Perryman ([1891] 2 Ch 269 (CA)) whereby the court almost invariably will not grant an… [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am by Marty Lederman
§ 18023(b)(1).So are these cases about nothing at all? [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 11:05 am
  The Judge concluded: “Like all civil litigation, this case was about money. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm by Giles Peaker
(Period and proportion of rent unknown). [read post]