Search for: "Any and All Unknown Claimants of Interest" Results 21 - 40 of 343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2022, 7:01 am by centerforartlaw
”  The email alleges that Lerner has no valid right, title, or interest in any physical embodiment of or copyright to the Darger artworks. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
The blue tick is currently offered to users “of public interest” at no charge as a mark of their notability and authenticity. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
No party in this case raised any issue about the existence in the school district of bullying or intolerance toward transgender children. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
The judge awarded damages in the sum of $300,000 including aggravated damages, plus interest of $6,656 and ordered the defendant to pay the claimant’s costs. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
As McPherson was the sole recipient of the messages and they did not cause any long-lasting adverse effects to the claimant, the Judge decided that the serious harm threshold was not met. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
To be sure, politics plays a key role in any constitutional transformation; not all, or even most, of these constitutional commitments were driven by genuine care for the environment. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The court upheld the trial decision of Nicklin J that defences of truth, honest opinion and public interest did not succeed. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 11:25 am by Jonathan Bailey
Most of the cases don’t have any information at all, as the CCB has not made any determination. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:18 am by INFORRM
It is all very well for Raab to rattle the sabre with his jingoistic talk of the Response document being the ‘opening salvo against SLAPPs’ and of ‘defend[ing] to the hilt those who bravely speak out in the public interest’ but there is no recognition in this response of a possible misalignment between the perception of public interest of those who provided “evidence” and the view of public interest taken by the law. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 10:17 am by Daniel S. Blynn
Maybe the reason for its inclusion is simply an abundance of caution to limit any argument by a California-based class member that she did not mean to release any unknown claims by taking part in the Alvarez settlement. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
We consider that punitive damages may be a particularly appropriate reform measure in a SLAPPs context, given that they are appropriate for cases where Claimants know there is no or very limited risk of paying significant damages so for any misconduct, making the benefit to them of misconduct, for all intents and purposes, unqualified. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
Osbourne sought a freezing injunction "restraining the dissipation of non-fungible assets alleged to have been stolen by persons unknown from a crypto asset account maintained by the claimant. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
All that is prohibited is the specified deliberate tortious conduct carried out as part of an agreement and with the intention of harming the claimant’s lawful business interests [59-60]. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The judgment confirms that evidence of general bad reputation may only be admitted when it is within the relevant sphere of a claimant’s reputation, but evidence of the same allegation having been made against the claimant may not be relied on in accordance with the rule in Dingle. [read post]
5 May 2022, 1:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In these circumstances, except in the most-clear cut cases, it may be harder for claimants to successfully prosecute claims. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The first and second claimants are mother and child. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Justice Martin Spencer decided that the principles of open justice and the interests of the press overrode the claimant’s desire to keep her name out of press reporting. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The injunction was also granted to the claimant in respect of the harassment claim [41]. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
 All defendants pointed to the total failure to identify any publication at all, and noted that limitation has now passed should any such publication now surface. [read post]