Search for: "Appeal of Vasquez" Results 21 - 40 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2020, 12:00 pm by Immigration Prof
BIA Continues Line of Cases Validating Deficient NTAs Despite Grave Errors by Geoffrey Hoffman The latest decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), Matter of Herrera-Vasquez, 27 I&N Dec. 825 (BIA 2020), is another case in the trend of... [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a 74-page opinion filed February 24, and later ordered published on March 17, 2020, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division 7) affirmed judgments (granting the writ petition and awarding fees) in coordinated appeals stemming from a CEQA action successfully challenging the City of Agoura Hills’ (City) project approvals and mitigated negative declaration (MND) for a mixed use development project on an undeveloped 8.2 acre parcel. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a judge’s decision to grant a preliminary injunction against the state’s “blackout period. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Accident victims sometimes have the opportunity of bringing a legal action to be compensated for their losses. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:38 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
In a brief yet temporary win for employers, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals depublished its Vasquez opinion. [read post]
To the shock of employers, on May 2, 2019, a unanimous three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals (the Panel), in Vasquez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 3:20 pm by Jon Brodkin
(credit: Getty Images | Noel Vasquez ) A US appeals court ruling today said that cable companies do not have a First Amendment right to discriminate against minority-run TV channels. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 7:42 am by Daniel Cappetta
Vasquez, the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that although the judge erred in admitting evidence of prior misconduct by the defendant that resembled his conduct in the present case, the error did not create a substantial likelihood of a miscarriage of justice. [read post]