Search for: "Appel v. DEPT. OF STATE HIGHWAYS"
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2016, 10:31 pm
Soldatenko v Village of Scarsdale Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 2016 WL 1576925 (NYAD 2 Dept. 4/20/2016) Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Zoning Administration [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 1:37 pm
To continue with the cheery news, the First Dept., in an April 7, 2009 decision in a construction accident case, Kleinberg v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 1:57 pm
Dept. of Transportation v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 8:35 am
A Washington appellate court ruled in 2013, in Nielsen v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 6:01 am
In Massachusetts Highway Dept. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
Highway Dept., et al , 5/10/07. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 10:38 pm
One of the only notable valuation rulings I’ve encountered is Vick v Albert, 47 AD2d 482 [1st Dept 2008], a case I previously wrote about here. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:32 am
In Estevez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:35 pm
State, Dept. of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Dept of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, No. 2017-CA002318 (Fla. 4th Cir. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 11:06 am
McGaughey v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:34 am
State ex rel. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
State of California, Dept. of Motor Vehicles (June 22, 2023) (“Nunes I”) 88 Cal. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
., et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Robert Genis, for appellant. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Robert Genis, for appellant. [read post]
