Search for: "Appell v. Webster" Results 21 - 40 of 286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2015, 1:43 pm
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: AC35575 - Webster Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 1:08 pm
Today's DJ features Jimmy Azadian and Cory Webster in High Court Ruling Clarifies Anti-SLAPP in Discrimination Suits about the Cal Supremes' Park v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 3:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Peter Webster of the Carlton Fields law firm takes a look at a recent Florida intermediate appellate court decision interpreting and applying a D&O insurance policy’s Insured vs. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 3:46 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The only prior appellate decision to characterize the right to an accounting in similar terms is a First Department decision over three decades earlier in Koppel v Wien, Lane & Malkin, 125 AD2d 230 [1st Dept 1986], cited in the Webster decision. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
When Doug Selman Builders, LLC. appealed the judgment against it in Webster v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:33 am by Tyler Green
Actually, it’s a 2018 case called Gill v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARK S. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:27 am by Jeremy Speres
Just over a year ago, we reported on a rather confusing trade mark infringement and expungement judgement of the Western Cape High Court in Etraction v Tyrecor. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Earlier, we discussed the elements of a Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim as enunciated in Shan Yun Lin v Lau  2022 NY Slip Op 06279  Decided on November 9, 2022  Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 3:03 pm
The Third District Appellate Court of California's Court of Appeals has just issued People v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, the Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court's ruling that a report prepared by an outside consultant for the agency was not shown to be eligible for the "intra-agency materials exemption" permitted by FOIL.Public Officers Law §87 sets out the "ground rules" for a party accessing government records. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, the Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court's ruling that a report prepared by an outside consultant for the agency was not shown to be eligible for the "intra-agency materials exemption" permitted by FOIL.Public Officers Law §87 sets out the "ground rules" for a party accessing government records. [read post]