Search for: "Apple Inc. v. Vidal"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Background Following the seminal case of Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311, this is the second significant piece of litigation arising from Google’s use of the so-called “Safari Workaround” in 2011-2012. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 2:44 pm
Apple Inc., No. 23-230, the patentee PMC argues that the court improperly applied prosecution laches to render its patents entirely unenforceable. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 7:59 am
Apple Inc., et al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
In Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (Information Commissioner intervening) [2015] EWCA Civ 311 the Court of Appeal concluded that the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights required the remedy of compensation where distress had been suffered as a result of a breach of duty. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 8:52 am
The Safari Workaround was essentially the subject-matter of Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311 [2016] QB 1003. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 5:42 pm
References The UK case: Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (Vidal-Hall, Hann and Bradshaw v Google Inc);http://www.5rb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Vidal-Hall-v-Google.pdf The ECJ Judgment: C-131/12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González” can be found onhttp://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf? [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am
The claim alleged that between August 2011 and February 2012, Google breached its duties as a data controller to over 4 million Apple iPhone users resident in England and Wales. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:53 am
Vopper (532 U.S. 534 (2001)) and Time, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 2:48 am
Cir. 2012); Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Vidal v. [read post]
