Search for: "Apple Inc. v. Vidal"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2022, 7:59 am
Apple Inc., et al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
In Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (Information Commissioner intervening) [2015] EWCA Civ 311 the Court of Appeal concluded that the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights required the remedy of compensation where distress had been suffered as a result of a breach of duty. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 8:52 am
The Safari Workaround was essentially the subject-matter of Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311 [2016] QB 1003. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 5:42 pm
References The UK case: Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (Vidal-Hall, Hann and Bradshaw v Google Inc);http://www.5rb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Vidal-Hall-v-Google.pdf The ECJ Judgment: C-131/12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González” can be found onhttp://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf? [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am
The claim alleged that between August 2011 and February 2012, Google breached its duties as a data controller to over 4 million Apple iPhone users resident in England and Wales. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:08 pm
Wash.2014) Apple Inc. v Motorola, Inc. 2014 WL 1646435 (CAFC, 2014) AvePoint, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
Apple Inc., 2014 BCSC 1821 Albayate v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:53 am
Vopper (532 U.S. 534 (2001)) and Time, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 2:48 am
Cir. 2012); Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Vidal v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
Cinar: Blatant Copying is Substantial Copying http://t.co/TO9Kv0tJuI -> http://t.co/s1nb3ccfiz recommended reads http://t.co/jgvPKGZsxp -> Nimmer Urges Congress To Reaffirm Copyright Act’s “Making Available” Right http://t.co/G3T0a7pQ4n -> Net neutrality gets a kick in the teeth | ZDNet http://t.co/NIVsYzOVum -> Oracle suit against third party maintenance contractor ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
Cinar: Blatant Copying is Substantial Copying http://t.co/TO9Kv0tJuI -> http://t.co/s1nb3ccfiz recommended reads http://t.co/jgvPKGZsxp -> Nimmer Urges Congress To Reaffirm Copyright Act’s “Making Available” Right http://t.co/G3T0a7pQ4n -> Net neutrality gets a kick in the teeth | ZDNet http://t.co/NIVsYzOVum -> Oracle suit against third party maintenance contractor ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
