Search for: "Application of Atkinson" Results 21 - 40 of 197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2021, 1:06 pm by Lucas Harty
” Admissions Officer Monique Atkinson Underrated: Proofreading “Let’s go back to the basics! [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 12:08 pm by The Murray Law Firm
Local News A shooting outside The New Fountains apartment complex in Fitchburg reportedly claimed the life of 20-year-old Julian Patterson of Fort Atkinson Monday night, March 12, 2018. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:00 pm by The Murray Law Firm
According to FOX Carolina, the shooting occurred at the “Hillcrest Apartments…on Atkinson Street,” around 3:30 a.m. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As was no indication in the record that Atkinson's letter of resignation was delivered to the appointing authority or filed by, or on behalf of, Atkinson with the appointing authority's office prior to the Atkinson's request to rescind it, the appointing authority's consent to Atkinson withdrawal of his resignation was not required to validated Atkinson's withdrawal of his resignation. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As was no indication in the record that Atkinson's letter of resignation was delivered to the appointing authority or filed by, or on behalf of, Atkinson with the appointing authority's office prior to the Atkinson's request to rescind it, the appointing authority's consent to Atkinson withdrawal of his resignation was not required to validated Atkinson's withdrawal of his resignation. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
As was no indication in the record that Atkinson's letter of resignation was delivered to the appointing authority or filed by, or on behalf of, Atkinson with the appointing authority's office prior to the Atkinson's request to rescind it, the appointing authority's consent to Atkinson withdrawal of his resignation was not required to validated Atkinson's withdrawal of his resignation. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
As was no indication in the record that Atkinson's letter of resignation was delivered to the appointing authority or filed by, or on behalf of, Atkinson with the appointing authority's office prior to the Atkinson's request to rescind it, the appointing authority's consent to Atkinson withdrawal of his resignation was not required to validated Atkinson's withdrawal of his resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil… [read post]