Search for: "Application of Her Majesty The Queen" Results 21 - 40 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 5:52 am by sally
Supreme Court FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 22 (25 May 2011) SK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 23 (25 May 2011) Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC 24 (25 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Spencer, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1231 (20 April 2011) Thomas, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1295 (25 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K Children), Re [2011] EWCA Civ 635 (25 May 2011)… [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:54 pm
He was thus delighted to receive from old Katfriend Chris de Mauny this link to the BBC's report on today's Queen's Speech, the formal statement of Her Majesty's government's legislative intentions in the forthcoming session of Parliament. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 3:05 pm by Howard Friedman
In The Queen (On the Application of Cornerstone (Northeast) Adoption and Fostering Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:46 am by Katherine Gundersen
As a result, and subject to the views of the Parliament, we are now proposing that there should be no absolute exemption for information relating to communications with senior members of the Royal Family.We remain firmly of the view that communications between Her Majesty and other members of the Royal Family with Scottish Ministers - and other public authorities - should be handled sensitively and confidentially, with strict and appropriate application of the exemptions… [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 10:32 am by Magdaleen Jooste
  TRADE MARKS Recently the UKIPO saw a regal trade mark application, similarly to the 'Sussex Royal' trade mark, opposed by the Lord Chamberlain, on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v Gorman, Her Majesty’s Advocate v McDowall and Her Majesty’s Advocate v Paterson, heard 28 – 30 June 2011. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The royal baby also has potential relevance in the context of the Oath of Citizenship, which makes reference to the monarch, I swear (or affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:32 pm
 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario was also added as a respondent to the application and supported the municipality's position.In making her decision, Justice Mitchell started from the finding ("not seriously challenged by the Municipality in its argument on the application") that the present watercourse on the property "is the same watercourse located on the property in 1831" at the time of the Crown grant. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v Gorman, Her Majesty’s Advocate v McDowall and Her Majesty’s Advocate v Paterson, heard 28 – 30 June 2011. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 10:07 am
and MIDDLETON CASH AND CARRY (here, for those who consider her a gold-digger). [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate, heard 21 – 22 March 2011. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm by Patricia Hughes
It is not suggested in these appeals that Her Majesty was other than obliged by constitutional convention to accept that advice. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Davies and another) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and R (on the application of Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 6 – 7 July 2011. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
The relevant part of s. 16(1) reads as follows: 16. (1) Subject to sections 18 to 19.1, where a person is convicted of a designated substance offence and, on application of the Attorney General, the court is satisfied, on a balance of probabilities, that any property is offence-related property and that the offence was committed in relation to that property, the court shall (a) in the case of a substance included in Schedule VI, order that the substance be forfeited to Her… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate, heard 21 – 22 March 2011. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate, heard 21 – 22 March 2011. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:20 am by Mark Summerfield
  It involves a visit to Australia in 1963 by Queen Elizabeth II, in the course of which Her Majesty was sprayed with a formulation developed by CSIRO entomologist Doug Waterhouse, containing the chemical N, N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET), to ward off the country’s numerous and persistent flies. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
That is the question asked by Rose Hughes in her latest post. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 9:10 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Bieber (Aka Coleman) v R. [2008] EWCA Crim 1601 (23 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Revenue and Customs v Waste Recycling Group Ltd. [2008] EWCA Civ 849 (23 July 2008) Shore v Sedgwick Financial Services Ltd. [2008] EWCA Civ 863 (23 July 2008) Selvarajan v Wilmot & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 862 (23 July 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Drummond v Revenue and Customs [2008] EWHC 1758 (Ch) (23 July 2008) High Court (Queen’s… [read post]