Search for: "Application of Tate" Results 21 - 40 of 312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 13 February 2023, there was an application in the case of Byrne v Motorsport Vision Racing Ltd and others. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 1:33 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/2/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v… [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
 By a majority of 3:2 the Court found the Tate liable in the tort of private nuisance to flat owners overlooked by the viewing gallery of Tate Modern. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm by Giles Peaker
Fearn & Ors v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery (2023) UKSC 4 – can ‘visual intrusion’ by overlooking amount to actionable nuisance? [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:23 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On the second question, they consider that the answer depends on principles of reciprocity and compromise applicable to the Appellants and the Tate alike and the application of a standard of objective reasonableness informed by the character of the relevant locality, rather than focusing on whether a defendant’s use of its land is ‘ordinary’. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am by Matrix Law
Should the Court determine issues 1 and/or 2 above on a summary judgment and/or strike-out application? [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 26/1/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v… [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:17 am by Phil Dixon
Conditions of confinement claim against federal prison officials presented new Bivens context and was properly dismissed Tate v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 7:49 am by Will Baude
, Leider confronts the even more interesting (to me) question of remedy: [S]tates are counting on an asymmetry of legal liability. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:01 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/01/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v… [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 13/01/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square Operations… [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
It is clear that "[t]he only 'conduct' which the [s]tate sought to punish is the fact of communication. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:12 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 19/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v… [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Matrix Law
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue (as guardian for Andrew McCue) (AP) v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October… [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 1:06 pm by David Adelstein
Tate Transport Corp., 2022 WL 16963815 (M.D.Fla. 2022) clarifies the distinction between these duties with a focus on an insurer’s initial duty — the duty to defend. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
In the matter of an application by James Hugh Allister and others for Judicial Review  (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Clifford Peoples for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 30th November – 1st December 2022 R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council, heard 7th December 2022. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 1:32 am by Matrix Law
In the matter of an application by James Hugh Allister and others for Judicial Review  (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Clifford Peoples for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 30 November – 1 December [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd, heard 8th November 2022 R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales, heard 9th November 2022 News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 22nd November 2022 R (on the application of Maguire) v His Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Blackpool & Fylde… [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 9th November the Court will hear R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales, on appeal from [2020] EWHC 798. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in… [read post]