Search for: "Apt v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2014, 3:10 pm
 But they seemed entirely apt and not unnecessarily distracting. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:34 am by Beck, et al.
We have no intention of wading into the treacherous (and heated) debate about Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
United States in the context of the past eight years of Obamacare litigation. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 10:53 am
Harvie Wilkinson III (United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit) has posted Of Guns, Abortions, and the Unraveling Rule of Law (Virginia Law Review, forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 3:50 pm
Harvie Wilkinson III (United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit) has posted Of Guns, Abortions, and the Unraveling Rule of Law (Virginia Law Review, forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 5:32 am
Non-citizens living in the United States are certainly not held in slavery, but Taney's infamous phrase is still eerily apt: Because of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, the U.S. government can snatch any non-citizen living in the United States at any time, anywhere, and hold them indefinitely without the right of habeas corpus and without any of the criminal procedure protections afforded by the Bill of Rights. [read post]