Search for: "Argus Resources, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 3,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2008, 4:51 pm
v NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., et al., No. 07-1239 (Nov. 12, 2008):The District Court and the Ninth Circuit also held that when a plaintiff demonstrates a strong likelihood of prevailing on the merits, a preliminary injunction may be entered based only on a "possibility" of irreparable harm. . . . [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:07 am by WIMS
City of Waukesha Water Diversion application(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:46 am
The case was argued before the Supreme Court on Monday, December 2. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:25 pm by WIMS
      Plaintiffs, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and several conservation groups, argued that in 2005 the United States Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau) renewed forty-one water service contracts with various water users without conducting an adequate consultation under § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act and that the contracts jeopardize the existence of the delta smelt. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 7:55 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., No. 07-1239. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:08 pm by WIMS
GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS (click here)33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental ProfessionalsWaste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 11:16 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Design Resources, Inc., the plaintiff, argued that even if the ad and accompanying article were couched in terms of opinion, principles of defamation law teach that statements of apparent opinion can be actionable if they imply the existence of underlying facts. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 12:50 am
"To the extent that Plaintiff's Motion appears to be nothing more than a repeat of the merits of its Motion for Summary Judgment, it could be argued that Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions constitutes a waste of judicial resources. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:07 am
Oral argument argued before the Eighth Circuit U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 9:01 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Mission Product Holdings, Inc. [read post]
Specifically, Clews argued the proposal interfered with the ability of people and animals at the ranch to evacuate in the event of a wildfire. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
Aggrieved owners may then sue the government, arguing that they are entitled to relief because the public action complained of amounts to a taking of their property. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
Aggrieved owners may then sue the government, arguing that they are entitled to relief because the public action complained of amounts to a taking of their property. [read post]