Search for: "Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000)" Results 21 - 37 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2008, 4:14 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000) [certain additional “badges of fairness” for arbitration clauses required in employment situations].) [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:08 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, it was required to conduct judicial review sufficient to protect plaintiff’s unwaivable statutory rights arising from his FEHA claims. [read post]
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83) when drafting the agreement, rather than attempting to give itself some advantages, the arbitration clause may have been saved. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am by Jessica E. Hawk
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, the court found that four clauses in the arbitration provision were unconscionable, including clauses permitting an appeal only from an award exceeding $100,000 or that included injunctive relief, requiring the appealing party to pay appeal costs subject to an apportionment of those costs by the arbitrators, and exempting repossession from arbitration while requiring that requests… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am by stevemehta
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 114-121 (Armendariz).) [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:28 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000), for its authority to vacate the decision, which stated that a court is supposed to review an arbitrator’s awards to ensure the protection of an employee’s unwaivable statutory rights arising under FEHA. [read post]