Search for: "Arnold v. Board of Accountancy" Results 21 - 40 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
  Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
Eleonora and Hugo Cuddigan QC attended a lively discussion chaired by the Hon Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
The unrest is not, as might have been supposed, only at the level of the Examiners and regular employees, but even within the exalted ranks of the Boards of Appeal and Enlarged Board. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
While an old proposal to make the Boards of Appeal more independent of the rest of the EPO is now seemingly dead in the water, Merpel reports that plans afoot to review the position of the Boards of Appeal have been discussed at the "Board of the Administrative Council" (AC) or "Board 28".* BREAKING NEWS: breakfast ruling on unfertilised eggsJeremy breaks the news of the Court of Justice of the European Union delivering its decision… [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Monday, October 31, 2022 Tags: Investment advisers, Investment Advisers Act, legal framework, regulation, SEC, SEC enforcement Lessons from Twitter v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
 Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v… [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:11 am
The Debate will be chaired by Sir Richard Arnold. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers… [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
.* Breaking News: Enlarged Board appeals - direct to the Administrative CouncilThe suspension of a Board of Appeal member by the EPO President, under the guise of a "house ban", reported here, has generated enormous disquiet. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:58 am
 Adds Piers: "In terms of phonetic similarity, the General Court held that the Board of Appeal had erred by not taking into account the fact that in certain languages of the European Union (in particular French and German) the letter “k” can be pronounced “ka” (and the pronunciation of “km” is not usual). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:33 am
"Mr Justice Arnold further observed that "[a] patentee with faith in its case on the merits would be unlikely to engage in shielding" (para., 109). [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Lord Justice Arnold gave observations on the EBA’s decision in G2/21. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
The defendant here took a risky approach to defending the account: it didn’t. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
The marks were invalidated almost a year ago by the Appeal Board, after they saw that the marks were disparaging to Native Americans under section 2(a) of the Lanham Act.* Were the condoms "made in Germany" and why does it matter? [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 6:05 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The three-step Coco v AN Clark test was applied to the dispute. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:16 am
 Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]