Search for: "Arnold v. D"
Results 21 - 40
of 580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:21 am
Arnold. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
ShaughnessyOn Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals No. 161903789 Sean D. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Arnold Padgett v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In Littlefield v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 6:19 am
See In re Boucher, 2007 WL 4246473 (D. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:28 am
He was promoting his new book, Un quinquennat pour rien (‘A wasted presidency’), which included an introduction titled ‘La France au défi de l’Islam’ (‘France and the challenge of Islam’) [5]. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
Arnold v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:45 am
National Westminster Bank Plc v Rushmer [2010] EWHC 554 (Ch) is a rather complex case involving enforcement of charging orders. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:45 am
National Westminster Bank Plc v Rushmer [2010] EWHC 554 (Ch) is a rather complex case involving enforcement of charging orders. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:14 pm
But he'd probably have been perfectly happy with a dispute over the ownership of a wall, as in The Creative Foundation v Dreamland Leisure Ltd & Ors [2015] EWHC 2556 (Ch) (11 September 2015).Separating intellectual property from the concrete items in or on which it is carried or displayed is a big conceptual problem for anyone coming fresh to the topic. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:32 am
Connecticut (D. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:10 pm
In King v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
So it is with slight delay that the IPKat comes to the latest decision in the apparently endless Hospira v Genentech saga. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 1:53 pm
The case is U.S. v Arnold, No. 06-50581, D.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:40 pm
IPKat copyright event on 14 March: you can attend in person ...In late 2023, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales issued its judgment in THJ v Sheridan [2023] EWCA Civ 1354. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 3:59 am
Lawrence Trading Inc., elle doit verser 4 844 658 $ à titre de perte d’intérêts et d’honoraires professionnels ainsi que pour l’atteinte à la réputation d’Irving Ludmer et d’Arnold Steinberg de même que pour le stress et les inconvénients subis par ces derniers. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:16 am
Come on CJEU, give us a decision which leads to a valid SPC....The AmeriKat is whiskers deep in papers at the moment, but she took a few minutes just now to have a look at this morning's latest SPC decision from the Court of Justice of the European Union in C-443/17 Abraxis v Comptroller General of Patents, which was subject to a referral made by Mr Justice Arnold on 16 March 2017 (see previous IPKat posts here). [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 6:51 am
On May 3, 2013, the Florida Supreme Court accepted for review two cases involving the apportionment of joint proposals for settlement: Arnold v. [read post]
