Search for: "Arnold v. USA"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:59 pm
Panera Bread Company, January 5, 2018, Arnold, M.). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
It is therefore unclear whether advocacy demonstrating reasons for other outcomes is a successful strategy for debiasing.Greg Mandel (Professor, Temple University Law School, USA) summarized his original research on hindsight bias in patent law.[7]Mandel found, in an experimental study with mock jurors, a strong effect of hindsight bias. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
,ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm
Arnold J noted that smartwatches depend on computer software to operate. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:32 am
It is arguable that this has happened to the extent that some cases like FAPL v Murphy, or the Meltwater trilogy, have resulted in good precedents made by the UK courts, albeit backed up by CJEU referrals. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 7:28 am
Luego, el 2 de septiembre, Besosa rechazó la petición del gobierno para que se detuviera la demanda presentada el 20 de julio por las firmas Lex Claim; Jacana Holdings ( I, II, III, IV y V); MPR Investors LLC; ROLSG; RRW I LLC y SL Puerto Rico Fund II LP. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 1:14 am
The author, The Hon Mr Justice Arnold, requires no introduction.According to the publisher's website, this essential handbook for practitioners advising performers, their representatives, exploiters of performers’ rights and their representatives provides an in-depth treatment of performers’ statutory rights under Part II of the 1988 Copyright, Designs and Patents Act and subsequent legislation, together with broad coverage of the legal position of… [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
While Mr Justice Arnold considered that it was common general knowledge in the USA that gabapentin could be used for the treatment of pain, he considered that it was not general knowledge in the UK. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am
At least when a similar extension was being contemplated in the USA, it was openly acknowledged that the driving force behind such changes were the large business interests such as the Disney Corporation. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Garman Co., 843 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Ark. 1992); Arnold v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
