Search for: "At & G., INC. v. Zoning Board of Review" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
”17 The Court noted that “[g]eneral benefits are those that accrue to the community or the vicinity at large as a result of the appropriation,”18 while “[s]pecial benefits are those that accrue directly and solely to the landowner’s property. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
In July 2009, Darius was re-appointed by Governor Jennifer Granholm to sit on the Michigan State Board of Real Estate Appraisers, which provides licensure to state licensed and state certified real estate appraisers and real estate valuation specialists. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
(with one concurrence by Martin disagreeing with majority’s decision to perform de novo review of merits after finding petition did not meet requirements of AEDPA); and McClain v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:54 am by Patricia Salkin
OTR Media Group, Inc. v Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, 2015 WL 6510756 (NYAD 1 Dept. 10/29/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Signs, Zoning - Interpretation [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The consultant affirmed the suitability of a class 23 exemption, and in May, the Board approved the exemption and the sheriff’s request. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The consultant affirmed the suitability of a class 23 exemption, and in May, the Board approved the exemption and the sheriff’s request. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
[Page 1:] The plaintiffs, Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP, Great Hill Investors LLC, Fremont Holdco, Inc., and Bluesnap, Inc. [read post]