Search for: "At & T COMMUNICATIONS v. Marks"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 5:16 am
The General Court gave its decision today in a Community trade mark appeal, Case T-369/10 You-Q BV v OHIM. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
Simon Tam wasn’t the only one barred by the Lanham Act from reclaiming a historically derogatory term. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Compevo AB v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:12 pm
Or anyone else's, for that matter.Including but not limited to "kites" that aren't intended for me and that are marked "Do Not Read. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
The stripes at issue were five and represented on the side of sport shoes [Case T‑85/13, K-Swiss Inc v OHIM and Künzli SwissSchuh AG].4The dispute concerned the sign in subject of the Community figurative trade mark application No 4771978 (above), which the applicant K-Swiss Inc registered in 2007 with reference to “footwear” in class 25. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
When it used the bottles, Kosan fixed its name and logo (both of which were registered as Community word and figurative marks for gas) on to them. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:39 pm
This is an application for annulment brought by the proprietor of the national word mark TOSCA for perfumery products against the Board of Appeal's decision to dismiss its appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division, which refused the opposition to the application for registration of the Community figurative mark TOSCA BLU for goods in Classes 18 and 25.* On what is definitely a busy day for Mülhens there's also judgment in… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
World Champ Tech LLC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:24 am
Evid. 801(c) and 803; Safer, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
Facebook Private Publishers Aren’t State Actors–Manhattan Community Access v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 1:25 am
The claimant owned a Community Trade Mark for "MR SPICY", registered for food and drink. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
In particular the texts of the Trade Mark Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation should be rewritten to match what the Court of Justice said they actually meant in eg Case C-292/00 Davidoff v Gofkid [we've all got used to the law now, so it would be a shame to spoil things by changing it -- but hasn't the ECJ's ruling in Davidoff done quite a bit to clutter the register by extending trade mark protection way past that… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:19 am
Lashify, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
A few hours before the World Cup’s kick-off match, the General Court wrote another Chapter of the “R10” saga, concerning a trade mark related to one of the funniest Brazilian football players ever [Case T‑137/09 RENV, Nike International Ltd v OHIM, available in Frenchand Spanish]. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:37 pm
The IPKat craves your indulgence as he turns to Case T‑504/11 Paul Hartmann AG v OHIM, Protecsom SAS, a 4 February ruling of the First Chamber of the General Court of the European Union. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:30 am
In case you haven't been following, the patent community is facing a new cottage industry of false marking claims where plaintiffs pursue those who have marked their goods as patented.Falsely marking your goods as patented (or otherwise importing that a patent application has been filed), with an intent to deceive the public can subject you to a fine for false marking under the U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:29 am
This is his Community trade mark registration E8150286 for the word IPKAT, with a filing date of 11 March 2009 and a publication date of 25 May 2009. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:19 am
The General Court affirmed that the ORO marks could not be said to be scarcely distinctive, and Case T-344/03 Saiwa v OHIM-Barilla Alimentare (SELEZIONE ORO BARILLA could not be said to have established a precedent. [read post]
