Search for: "Atlantic Richfield Company"
Results 21 - 40
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
Atlantic Richfield Company et al regarding lead-based paint as a source of lead poisoning. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:56 am
In Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:01 pm
Landowners in the area want the company to go further and restore their property to its original condition, but Atlantic Richfield argues that their claims are trumped by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the federal law that Congress enacted nearly 40 years ago to manage and clean up hazardous-waste sites. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:21 pm
The case pits Atlantic Richfield Co., which owned the smelter when it shut down in 1980 and has spent nearly a half-billion dollars cleaning up the site following an EPA plan, against local landowners, who want the company to spend roughly $50 million more to return their properties to their original condition. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:15 pm
Atlantic Richfield Co. et. al., which seeks to hold five defendant paint companies liable for an alleged lead paint public nuisance in 10 county and municipal jurisdictions in the state. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:00 am
A-5699-16T3, involved a dispute between Plaintiffs Matthew and Karen Terranova and their company New Land Holdings, LLC, the current landowners of a contaminated gas station property, against Defendants General Electric Pension Trust, Atlantic Richfield Co., Amerco Real Estate Company, Charles Boris, Jr., Carol Boris, and Edward Wilgucki, former owner-operators at the site. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:32 am
Atlantic Richfield Company. [read post]
14 May 2011, 1:34 pm
The court's opinion in the case, BP America Production Company, Atlantic Richfield Company and Vastar Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 9:00 am
Atlantic Richfield Co. et al., Santa Clara Superior Court Case No. 1-00-cv-788657, issued a proposed statement of decision (SOD) after a 23-day bench trial premised on an "alleged public nuisance created by lead paint manufactured or sold by five Defendants in ten jurisdictions in California." [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Atlantic Richfield Company, et al. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
Atlantic Richfield Company, et. al., is making headlines this week as expert witness testimony is being heard in Santa Clara County Superior Court. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:25 pm
Atlantic Richfield Company et al. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 6:14 am
Atlantic Richfield then went to the U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
Lead Industries Association Inc., Atlantic Richfield Co., et al., 2018 IL App (1st) 172894 (Sept. 7, 2018). [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 2:20 am
Atlantic Richfield, et al. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm
Plaintiffs say it would cost $2.4 billion if implemented by the defendants.Their plan calls for the creation of a fund administered by the public entities.Defendant companies — Sherwin-Williams, NL Industries, ConAgra Grocery Products, DuPont and Atlantic Richfield Company — are expected to fiercely defend their position, saying plaintiffs did not meet a necessary test set forth by the state’s Sixth District Court of Appeal.The paint… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:21 pm
Atlantic Richfield Company, et al.Superior Court of California, County of Santa ClaraCase No. 1-00-CV-788657Found onRelated articlesPlaintiffs' expert says lead paint abatement could cost $1.4 billion (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Occupational exposure to lead paintLots of data to process for Calif. lead paint judge (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Judge again asks sides to settle in Calif. lead paint case (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)California cities seek $1… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:44 am
Atlantic Richfield Company, 866 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2017). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:44 am
Atlantic Richfield Company, 866 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2017). [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:26 am
Defendants NL Industries, the Sherwin-Williams Company, ConAgra Grocery Products, DuPont and Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), claim the suit is without merit, that blood lead levels in California are close to zero and that other exposures, such as gasoline, are more likely to elevate blood lead levels than lead paint.Congress banned lead-based paints in the U.S. in 1978, but plaintiffs contend the paint remains in millions of homes and is the... [read post]
