Search for: "Attorney General v. Gallagher" Results 21 - 40 of 164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2021, 7:04 am
  Attorney MalpracticeIn the case of Clark v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:21 pm
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in this fashion in Gallagher v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Another was filed by attorney Dan Peterson, representing Law Enforcement Groups and State and Local Firearms Rights Groups (Law Enforcement Brief), while a third was filed by the Crime Prevention Research Center, led by John R. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
  Chao was a patent attorney and patent litigator for 20 years before becoming a professor and I have long valued his insight. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
   Lower Courts Continue to Debate Scope of Gallagher v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
”  The judge in Conti also pointed out that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Gallagher “offer[ed] no opinion or comment on the enforceability of any other exclusion to UM or UIM coverage or to coverage in general,” citing Gallagher v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:59 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
By Gantman, P.J.E.), which involved important unsettled issues, including both the Sackett stacking issue as well as the issue of the retroactive effect of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's eradication of the household exclusion in the Gallagher v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 5:46 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
It was noted that, months before this issue came before this court, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had generally eradicated the household exclusion’s application under Pennsylvania law under similar circumstances at issue in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Aug. 21, 2018 Mundy, J.).Then, earlier this year, in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 5:11 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
By Gantman, P.J.E.), involved both the Sackett stacking issue as well as the issue of the retroactive effect of the Pennsylvania’s eradication of the household exclusion in the Gallagher v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, 156 A.D.3d 564, 567 (1st Dept. 2017) (citation omitted); see also DeStaso v. [read post]