Search for: "Atwater v. Lago Vista" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2013, 11:57 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Lago Vista, which held that law enforcement can arrest people for Class C misdemeanors for which the maximum penalty includes no jail time. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 5:34 am
Lago Vista (2001) 532 U.S. 318, in which the petitioner was arrested for a misdemeanor seatbelt violation, and Knowles v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kiran Bhat
City of Lago Vista and observes that Justice Alito “seemed more skeptical of the respondents (the jail) than I would have expected. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
To my mind, the case is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:24 am by Orin Kerr
As I see it, Florence is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am by Kali Borkoski
Ten years ago, in Atwater v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:27 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In 2001, just months after Perry's ascension to Governor, the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
City of Lago Vista), I'll bet somebody out there can top it. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 12:08 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
City of Lago Vista, which held that police can arrest people for offenses where the punishment is only a monetary fine - in this case a seat belt violation. [read post]