Search for: "August v. Social Security Administration Commissioner"
Results 21 - 40
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can require companies to disclose information about their climate, environmental, social, and governance risks and practices. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:05 am
(quoting Social Security Ruling 85-28). [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
Internet and Social Media The Centre for Internet and Society blog has published an analysis of Peiter “Mudge” Zatko’s whistleblower complaint with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, filed in July 2022, which accuses the platform of serious security failings. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
July 3, 2023, settled) SEC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The Family Court denied the father=s application and issued an order remanding the care and custody of the child to the Commissioner of Social Services. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval Service (LRS), August 20, 2007. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
WCAB panel decisions are citeable authority, particularly on issues of contemporaneous administrative construction of statutory language. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
” Protocol 16 to the European Convention will enter into force on 1 August 2018. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
As held in the case of Scarpuzza v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
Exhibit 1 is a benefit verification letter from the Social Security Administration dated October 15, 2021, that verifies applicant’s entitlement to monthly disability benefits. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
RLY, the governance token for the Rally social token platform. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
According to Conwell, his first fund raised money from a diverse group of investors via Rule 506(c) of Regulation D and a social media campaign (Rule 506(c) allows for general solicitation in some instances). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
Although this is a federal benefit, the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the courts generally look to state law to determine the answers to these two questions. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
The Commission consists of nine Senators, nine Members of the House of Representatives, and five senior Administration officials appointed by the President. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) On April 8, 2014, the European Court of Justice, sitting as the Grand Chamber, delivered its decision in Digital Rights Ireland Ltd (C‑293/12) v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Commissioner of the Garda Síochána, Ireland, The Attorney General. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
On Feb. 11, after Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas was confirmed, DHS announced that it would begin Phase 1 of a program to restore processing for those individuals already enrolled. [read post]
