Search for: "Austin v. Edwards" Results 21 - 40 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2012, 11:43 am by Marcia Coyle
“It’s highly likely we will take this case to the Supreme Court,” said Edward Blum, director of the Project on Fair Representation, a legal defense fund that backed the challenge in Shelby County, Ala. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 4:03 am
Edward Tyson worked for Austin Eating Disorders Partners (AED) as medical director of AED's Austin eating disorder treatment center. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:03 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Austin American-Statesmen via ABA Journal] [read post]
Abigail Fisher and Edward Blum, who were essential in the Fisher litigation, are now directors of the SFFA. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm by Edward Blum
Edward Blum, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, is the president of the Project on Fair Representation, which provided counsel to the petitioners in Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am by Conor McEvily
Briefly: At this blog, Edward Hartnett analyzes Monday’s opinion in Martel v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Edward Kennedy that he respected the precedent of Roe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:23 am by Steve Hall
White wrote for the majority in a 1977 case, Patterson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Potential Changes to Fund of Funds Arrangements Posted by Thomas Hiller, Brian McCabe, and Edward Baer, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Friday, February 1, 2019 Tags: Exchange-traded funds, Investment advisers, Investment Advisers Act, Investor protection, Risk management, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Section 12(d), Securities regulation The Latest on Proxy Access Posted by Holly J. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
Here is the court's memorandum opinion, and here is the case docket, in Donald Edward Beaty v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:48 am
Malcolm Feeley and Edward Rubin have just published an excellent book with the above title. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:21 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of and commentary on Monday’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]