Search for: "Avaya, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Patent Docs
Kirincich, the Director & Corporate Counsel for Avaya Inc. and John D. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 11:17 pm by Alex Gasser
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: • Cisco Systems, Inc. of San Jose, California • Cisco Consumer Products LLC of Irvine, California • Cisco Systems International B.V. of the Netherlands • Cisco-Linksys LLC of Irvine, California • Hewlett-Packard Co. of Palo Alto, California • 3Com Corporation of Marlborough, Massachusetts… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 5:44 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent No. 7,457,250 (the ‘250 patent): Cisco Systems, Inc. of San Jose, California Cisco Consumer Products LLC of Irvine, California Cisco Systems International B.V. of the Netherlands Cisco-Linksys LLC of Irvine, California Hewlett-Packard Co. of Palo Alto, California 3Com Corporation of Marlborough, Massachusetts Avaya Inc. of Basking Ridge, New Jersey Extreme Networks, Inc. of Santa Clara, California According to the complaint, the ‘250 patent… [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 5,585,007 entitled PLASMA CONCENTRATE AND TISSUE SEALANT METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR MAKING CONCENTRATED PLASMA AND/OR TISSUE SEALANT and owned by Ethicon, Inc. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 5,585,007 entitled PLASMA CONCENTRATE AND TISSUE SEALANT METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR MAKING CONCENTRATED PLASMA AND/OR TISSUE SEALANT and owned by Ethicon, Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:31 pm by Phillips & Cohen
The lawsuit alleges that beginning in the mid 1990s and until as recently as 2006, the company was charging state and federal offices for services that were dysfunctional or non-existent.The second company, CIT Group, Inc., paid over $3 million to resolve allegation that, after purchasing a portion of Avaya’s customer base, CIT continued the fraudulent billing scheme.The qui tam case was brought under the False Claims Act by two whistleblowers in 2004. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:33 am by gmlevine
Registering a domain name in the belief that the complainant’s trademark is generic does not absolve the respondent competitor, Avaya Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:04 am by Stanley D. Baum
Avaya Inc., No. 09-4043 (3rd Circuit 2010), Richard and Karen Shook, husband and wife, filed suit against Avaya Inc., Richard's former employer, alleging a violation of ERISA. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:18 am by gmlevine
” While “[c]ontinuous use adverse to the interest of Complainant is not a basis from which Respondent can acquire rights in the domain name,” Avaya Inc. v. [read post]