Search for: "B Bledsoe" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2015, 11:36 am by Mack Sperling
" Judge Bledsoe recognized that his Opinion means that a party loses its "right to seek revision of a summary judgment ruling by the trial court under Rule 54(b) when the issuing Superior Court Judge retires or otherwise leaves the bench prior to the entry of a final judgment. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Bledsoe, ___ F.3d ___, 2015 WL 74192, at *5 (3d Cir. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:22 pm by Mack Sperling
  Judge Bledsoe cited a couple of cases for the propositions that: “[B]lock billing is not objectionable ‘per se,’ though it may increase the risk that the trial court, in reasonable exercise of its discretion, will discount a fee request, and that block billing precludes the court from determining that all of the amounts claimed . . . are both compensable and reasonable. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:09 am by Nicholas Gebelt
Bledsoe (In re Bledsoe), 569 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2009) (transfer in regularly conducted divorce establishes reasonably equivalent value); Randy v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:48 am by Steve Hall
Fiorenza of the Galveston-Houston Archdiocese; Pastor James Nash of Houston Ministers Against Crime; and Southwest Regional Director of the Anti-Defamation League Martin B. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:41 am by Peter Smythe
In re Bledsoe, 41 S.W.3d 807, 811 (Tex. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:42 pm by Glenn Reynolds
MORE STILL: Reader Jerry Bledsoe disagrees with the above: As an admirer, libertarian and long-time reader, I’m amazed that you would present this and allow people to think it might be true. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:07 am by Sheppard Mullin
The Sixth Circuit held that nothing in Bledsoe II saved the complaint from its failure to meet the particularity requirements of Rule 9(b). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:30 pm by B.W. Barnett
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and elaborated upon in Bledsoe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:12 pm by Jim Livesay
The younger victim had his wrist “gouged,” Bledsoe said. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:51 pm
  Bledsoe is not being charged with violating § 922(b)(1), but of conspiring to make a false material statement in the purchase of a firearm, which she admitted doing. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
Bledsoe, who was nineteen at the time of the purchase, argues that the proscription in § 922(b)(1) on the sale of handguns by federally-licensed dealers to people under twenty-one violates her Second Amendment individual right to keep and bear arms, as recently recognized in District of Columbia v. [read post]