Search for: "B Farris"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2012, 9:48 am
Smith with Kleinfeld and B. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
b. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 8:07 am
Farias, No. 09-50269 (8-20-10) (Paez with B. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:17 pm
Evans-Martinez, No. 09-10098 (7-8-10) (Bea with Farris and D. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
In thus circumventing the ownership requirement in Rule 14a-8(b), Mr. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 10:24 am
The company contends that Chevedden failed to meet the proof-of-ownership requirements in SEC Rule 14a-8(b). [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 4:27 am
As for sentencing, the 9th upheld a constitutional challenge for vagueness in regards to the sentence enhancement (a doubling from 10 to 20 years) for a prior under 21 U.S.C. 841(b). [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:53 pm
State and Farris v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Farris et alAT&T v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:17 am
Hale, 307 Ark. 546 (1992) and Farris v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 5:55 pm
In August of 2007, LexBlog presented our first report on which AmLaw 200 firms where blogging. 39 AmLaw 200 firms blogging, producing a total of 74 blogs. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:50 am
Farris, No. 06-6394In an action brought by a disappointed bidder under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and state law alleging a deprivation of property without due process and violations of Kentucky law covering the award of public contracts, dismissal of the claims is affirmed as: 1) the procedural requirements of state lease procurement law do not afford plaintiff a property interest in getting the state to lease its real property; and 2) the Eleventh Amendment provides defendants immunity from… [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Farris Eastern District of Kentucky at FrankfortROGERS, Circuit Judge. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 4:00 am
Hale, 307 Ark. 546 (1992) and Farris v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 5:45 pm
Skopil, Betty B. [read post]
