Search for: "B. P. P."
Results 21 - 40
of 17,439
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2024, 12:00 am
Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) 28-1381 is the primary misdemeanor DUI statute addressing driving under the influence (DUI) in Arizona. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am
” The Federal Circuit further reasons that “[p]rinted matter encompasses what is communicated—the content or information being communicated—rather than the act of a communication itself. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
James P. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
James P. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Law):Clark B. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm
" (Ibid., p. 1). [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm
HUS is a frightening complication that even in the best American centers has a notable mortality rate.[56] Among survivors, at least 5 percent will suffer end stage renal disease (ESRD) with the resultant need for dialysis or transplantation.[57] But, “[b]ecause renal failure can progress slowly over decades, the eventual incidence of ESRD cannot yet be determined. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
Diddy (f/k/a Puff Daddy and P. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:22 am
., Director of Chemistry, B&C; and Lynn L. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:22 am
., Director of Chemistry, B&C; and Lynn L. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
Both (A) and (B).D. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 11:06 am
Therefore, Section 55.2(1) of the Canadian Patent Act had to be considered to be incompatible with the provisions of Article 28.1(a) and (b) of the TRIPS Agreement. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
que al ser elaboración y aprobación del gobierno, lógicamente no se iba a disparar en el pie y por eso contempla un amplio abanico de supuestos de silencio negativo para los empleados públicos. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
P. 60(b)(2). 4 decisions. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
P. 60(b)(2). 4 decisions. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 2:28 pm
P. 35. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:28 am
§ 170.19((b)(3). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
To determine whether an utterance constituted a criminal threat, the case of R v McCraw, 1991 CanLII 49 (SCC) indicated that this determination is a question of law the court further stated, at p.88, that the words: “Must be looked at in the context in which they were spoken or written, in light of the person to whom they were addressed and the circumstances in which they were uttered. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 12:08 pm
And to be sure, Fearless characterizes its contest as reflecting its "commitment" to the "[b]lack women-owned" business community. [read post]