Search for: "B. Zavala"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2012, 1:30 pm
Everyone has their favorite B. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
B. [read post]
Texas Whistleblower Act: Is an internal grievance always required prior to a whistle-blower lawsuit?
12 Oct 2011, 6:57 pm
Id. a § 554.004(b). [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:14 am
Pacientes asegurados con problemas de: alcohol, tabaco, cocaína, marihuana, pasta básica de cocaína, drogas sintéticas (éxtasis, LSD) juego patológico, Internet, traga monedas, compradores compulsivos y otros en la modalidad de Hospital de Día, Hospitalización Total, Consulta Externa y Adiccionología de Enlace, contando con personal altamente calificado. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:15 pm
LEROY B. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
(b)). [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:00 pm
Lead plaintiff Lupe Zavala didn't show evidence of actual injury, disqualifying him as representative of other consumers, she said. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Stephens, No. 071907 Conviction and sentence for drug-related crimes are affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded where: 1) even if the prior conviction was not admissible to show intent or for any other proper Rule 404(b) purpose, and despite the district court's imprecision in dealing with the prior bad-acts evidence, any error related to the evidence did not warrant the reversal of defendant's conviction; and 2) because a more thorough response to defendant's… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Brattain, No. 07-1594 A sentence for aggravated sexual abuse of a minor is vacated and remanded for resentencing where, contrary to the district court's conclusion, the district court's refusal to apply an enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 4B1.5(b) was error because defendant qualified as a repeat offender, and Congress explicitly revised the enhancement to apply to repeat-offenders who abuse only a single victim. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
ZAVALA v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 3:12 pm
That is, if subsection (a) does not apply, then subsection (b) might; and if neither (a) nor (b) applies, then (c) might. . . . [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 12:45 pm
Zavala, No. 05-7001-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:09 am
Cereceres-Zavala,No. 05-2191, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
All case summaries below are from the FindLaw Weekly Opinion Summaries, August 27 through August 31, 2007. [read post]
