Search for: "BARNES v. MANIS" Results 21 - 40 of 675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2008, 8:40 am
There are many stories today, including: "Court hears Ind. self-representation case," reported by Maureen Groppe, IndyStar Washington Bureau; and "The rights of the Mentally Ill: High Court Weighs Self-Representation," reported by Robert Barnes of the Washington Post. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 3:20 pm
March 23, 2007) (Bailey, Vaidik, Barnes). [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
Last night, at the Woolly Mammoth Theater in DC, members of the Volokh Conspiracy participated in a panel discussion of the free speech issues raised by the play Arguendo, which concerns the Supreme Court oral argument in Barnes v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
  While many scholars of educational desegregation assure us that the beginning of the end of the “separate but equal” doctrine was set underway with Brown v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:10 am
"It would shut the door on that issue, which many people thought had been shut in Coker v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 6:38 am by John Elwood
(John Elwood) Robert Barnes’ piece in the Washington Post today recounts a hypothetical from Justice Breyer at yesterday’s argument in Lozano v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 1:28 pm
 The closest the Court of Appeal comes is its reference to the area at issue as a place that includes "vineyards for the Redwood Ridge Estates Winery, llama and alpaca grazing land, [and] barns. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:02 am by Eric
All three Craigslist responses came just before the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Barnes v. [read post]