Search for: "BARNETT v. STATE" Results 21 - 40 of 1,195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
The court held that the FTC had applied the wrong legal standard in evaluating Illumina’s “open offer” (see me here; Alden Abbott here and here; Jonathan Barnett here; and the International Center for Law & Economics’ (ICLE) amicus brief here). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:32 pm by Sambhav Sankar
The court had already held in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
The Barnett/Blackman casebook includes a photo of the assassination and hotel, right before an excerpt from Printz v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
Supreme Court’s 2019 Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm by jonathanturley
  The panel declared that AR-15s are not protected by the Second Amendment in overturning the preliminary injunction win Barnett v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm by David Kopel
[Only one federal firearms prohibitor does not require any specfic finding of fact] On November 7, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the only Second Amendment merits case this term, United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:54 am by David Kopel
[Amicus brief in Supreme Court's Second Amendment Rahimi case] This week amicus briefs were filed in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Australians being sued for defamation may miss out on new defences depending on which state or territory law applies, prompting renewed calls for the federal government to step in to pass national defamation laws. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:31 pm by Ilya Somin
United States (which I discussed here), the Supreme Court yesterday decided to hear another Takings Clause case: Sheetz v. [read post]