Search for: "BOARD OF ASSESS. APPEALS v. Country Club" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
In the midst of all this churn, Connecticut finds itself increasingly left behind—still wealthy, but increasingly the declining country club of th [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Regulators in other countries are also being proactive around climate-related financial disclosures. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
Awareness Most community members in areas with active boards are aware of the Mediation Boards. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Under Canadian law, a formal Revlon-style auction is not always necessary for a target board to satisfy its fiduciary duties in a change of control context. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Ronald Collins
It is to be far more balanced and transparent in my analysis and assessment of competing arguments. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In Eldridge v British Columbia, the Court found that the failure of hospitals to provide sign-language services for hearing-impaired patients was a violation of section 15. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo MSN – Michael Schmidt (New York Times) | Published: 11/5/2019 A critical witness in the impeachment inquiry offered Congress substantial new testimony, revealing he told a top Ukrainian official that the country likely would not receive American military aid unless it publicly committed to investigations President Trump wanted. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
“The white race deems itself to be the dominant race in this country,” he contended. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
In deciding what to make of the photos, the judge decided that the photographs, as “snapshots in time” and “taken out of context,” had only minimal evidentiary weight, but they were still “highly relevant” to the assessment of damages regarding the plaintiff’s claim for loss of enjoyment of life. [read post]