Search for: "BOTTOM v. MINER" Results 21 - 40 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The court was particularly persuaded of this considering how the Louisiana Supreme Court has defined the relationship between unit operators and unleased mineral owners, as well as considering the prior ruling in J&L Family, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:28 am by Charles Sartain
Trimont Energy (BL) LLC, a Louisiana federal court considered whether a lessee was required to remove flowlines buried beneath the surface and canal bottoms of property subject to mineral leases. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:02 am
The Texas Supreme Court has granted the plaintiffs' petition to review a case important for Texas mineral owners, Hooks v. [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:19 am by John McFarland
The Texas Supreme Court asked the Hyders to respond to Chesapeake’s motion for rehearing in Chesapeake v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 4:24 am by Charles Sartain
” The BP bottom-lease was a conveyance of the mineral estate (less portions expressly reserved, such as royalty) as a determinable fee. [read post]