Search for: "BRETT WILLIAMS v. THE STATE" Results 21 - 40 of 299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 2:33 pm by Richard M. Re
Justice Brett Kavanaugh soon joined in, asking why something that the states supposedly regarded as so important would not have been addressed in the constitutional text. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 4:49 am by SHG
Lacking the mad skillz of Yale law students to know with absolute certainty that the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court means “people will die,” it seemed prudent to consider what Judge Kavanaugh had actually said or written in the past rather than to assume he would reverse Roe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am by Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman
Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s majority opinion once again cites Germaine for the proposition that “[t]he Constitution for purposes of appointment . . . divides all its officers [of the United States] into two classes. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm by Amy Howe
Instead, Kavanaugh appeared receptive to a version of the theory, outlined by Chief Justice William Rehnquist in a concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Law360 (subscription required), retired state-court judge George Eskin urges the justices to review Lacaze v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Julie Burkhart warns that “[t]he confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court will lead to a decision to overturn or gut the essence of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In a blissfully short majority opinion, Justice William O. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:47 pm
  My infatuation began with Judge Evans' opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams names “the one Supreme Court opinion everyone should read”: Lucia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Seung Min Kim and John Wagner report that “Supreme Court nominee Brett M. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm by Scott R. Anderson
Chief Justice William Rehnquist articulated this view in his concurrence in Bush v. [read post]