Search for: "BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC."
Results 21 - 40
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Note that the potential for the assertion of neighbouring rights to prevent de minimis uses and fair dealing with recorded music is another highly problematic feature of copyright law in the realm of music: see, for example, Bridgeport Music Inc v Dimension Films, 410 F 3d 792 (6th Cir 2005). 15 For a critique of copyright law’s vision of the author, originality, and cultural practices, see Carys J Craig, Copyright, Communication and Culture:… [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:28 am
While copyrighted sound recordings have been protected for over forty years by the Copyright Act of 1976, whether digital sampling constitutes copyright infringement may now depend on where in the country a copyright infringement case is litigated.For over ten years, Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 3:17 pm
In consolidated appeals, the court agreed with the district court that plaintiff lacked standi… read more » Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:17 pm
Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:54 am
In Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:03 pm
")Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:26 am
" In Bridgeport Music, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:12 pm
Compare the 6th Circuit’s Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Sixth Circuit did, however, reverse and remand the judgment due to the excessive punitive damages award and the inclusion of prejudgment and compound interest in the compensatory award.More detail of Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 6:39 pm
Supreme Court (Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:02 am
With respect to sampling sound recordings, the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:45 pm
The Sixth Circuit agreed with the district court's decision that the plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence that Universal had granted a license, and therefore contributorily infringed Bridgeport's copyright, and that receipt of royalties alone by Universal was insufficient to create contributory copyright infringement.More detail of Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
Rock on the River, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Western District of Wisconsin – December 29th, 2017) involves an assault that occurred at a music festival in Bridgeport, Wisconsin. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 9:45 am
Bridgeport Music Inc et al, Civ. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:09 pm
See Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:20 am
This analysis is complicated by the fact that current copyright law, at least under the Sixth Circuit’s reasoning in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:33 pm
The Plaintiff are seeking declaratory judgment that their song “Blurred Lines” does not infringe on the song “Sexy Ways” by the Funkadelics (owned by Bridgeport Music, Inc.) nor “Got To Give It Up” by Marvin Gaye (owned by heirs of Marvin Gaye) (collectively “Defendants”). [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
However, the district court's assessment of the various factors was not an abuse of discretion, and the court therefore affirmed the award.More detail of Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 7:45 am
And just exactly what is the Sixth Circuit’s radical holding in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 6:13 am
WB Music, and Riviera Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
