Search for: "BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC."
Results 21 - 40
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2015, 1:47 am
The Appeals Court decision in Blurred Lines is keenly awaited by many.More on Billboard here , Williams v Bridgeport Music, Inc, No. 13-06004 (C.D. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 9:45 am
Bridgeport Music Inc et al, Civ. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
Sound of Music operated nine stores throughout Minnesota in 1978. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
’ Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:07 am
Pioli The music industry did not get far into 2015 before delivering a blockbuster copyright case. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Note that the potential for the assertion of neighbouring rights to prevent de minimis uses and fair dealing with recorded music is another highly problematic feature of copyright law in the realm of music: see, for example, Bridgeport Music Inc v Dimension Films, 410 F 3d 792 (6th Cir 2005). 15 For a critique of copyright law’s vision of the author, originality, and cultural practices, see Carys J Craig, Copyright, Communication and Culture:… [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:33 pm
The Plaintiff are seeking declaratory judgment that their song “Blurred Lines” does not infringe on the song “Sexy Ways” by the Funkadelics (owned by Bridgeport Music, Inc.) nor “Got To Give It Up” by Marvin Gaye (owned by heirs of Marvin Gaye) (collectively “Defendants”). [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
DOES 1-99 ND Illi 2013http://t.co/namjuCtHIZ -> Supreme Court Denies Leave To Appeal In C-Map USA Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:28 am
It’s a Contract Interpretation Quiz (I’ve added the emphasis): Interpret this contract, reproduced below in full: In consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good, valuable, and adequate consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the undersigned does hereby sell, assign, transfer, and set over to Bridgeport Music, Inc., its respective successors and assigns, fifty percent (50%) of his interest now owned or… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:31 am
Just one month ago in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 3:17 pm
In consolidated appeals, the court agreed with the district court that plaintiff lacked standi… read more » Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:54 am
In Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:20 am
This analysis is complicated by the fact that current copyright law, at least under the Sixth Circuit’s reasoning in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:49 pm
” Image from MySA.com Image from Yelp Swig, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:12 pm
Compare the 6th Circuit’s Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Diamond as compared with Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:58 am
., Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
Random House, Inc.[10] and in New Era Publications Int'l v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 12:27 pm
See Newton, 388 F.3d 1189; see also Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
