Search for: "BROWN v HART" Results 21 - 40 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2023, 2:30 pm by Bryan West
Browne v Dunn Rears Its Head Against this, the defendant’s case suffered from a tendency to attempt to produce inadmissible hearsay, and contravention of the ancient tripwire Browne v Dunn, a case from 1893 that requires litigants to put statements of fact to opposing witnesses in cross-examination if the litigant later intends to claim that the statement of fact contradicts the testimony of the opposing witness. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:35 pm by Walter Olson
Alas, my chapter on institutional reform litigation in Schools for Misrule has proved only too relevant to the headlines: In today’s 5-4 Brown v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am by Stephen Griffin
  In the process the article raises questions about how we should understand the scope of the achievement of those who sponsored and ratified the Reconstruction amendments.In the last part of “Optimistic Originalism” I discuss why Brown is commonly viewed as a “living constitutionalist” opinion (Here and elsewhere in these posts I put living constitutionalism in scare quotes because I think the real issue is how to understand the process of constitutional change… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:35 pm by Marcia Coyle
Melissa Hart of the University of Colorado Law School, and Andrew Pincus, partner at Mayer Brown, who represented AT&T Mobility in that class action arbitration challenge. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 10:01 am by Steve Bainbridge
The poll conducted by Hart Research Associates surveyed 810 voters. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Burset, Notre Dame Law School, have updated their paper on Entick v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
A finding of 100% contributory negligence should never be made: see Part III.G.i. [13] Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (UK), SI 1998/3132, r 44.3(2)(a). [14] Onay v Brown [2009] EWCA Civ 775; Sonmez v Kebabery Wholesale Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1386. [15] Maes Finance Ltd v AL Phillips & Co (1997) The Times, 25 March (Ch D); Lunnun v Singh (1999) The Times, 19 July (CA). [16] See, eg, Pankhurst v White [2006] EWHC 2093 (QB). [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  For Dworkin—and many American constitutional theorists of the second half of the twentieth century—the existing story made Brown v. [read post]