Search for: "BROWN v HART"
Results 21 - 40
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm
Burset, Notre Dame Law School, have updated their paper on Entick v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:55 am
He writes: Suppose that in 1924 this Court had expressly reaffirmed Plessy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
On 16 February 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 06462-21 Benwell v plymouthherald.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03211-21 Brown v The Courier, 1 Accuracy (2021) Breach – sanction: publication of correction 01887-21 Rahnama v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were… [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Jack M. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
In the process the article raises questions about how we should understand the scope of the achievement of those who sponsored and ratified the Reconstruction amendments.In the last part of “Optimistic Originalism” I discuss why Brown is commonly viewed as a “living constitutionalist” opinion (Here and elsewhere in these posts I put living constitutionalism in scare quotes because I think the real issue is how to understand the process of constitutional change… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
New State Legislation Regarding Restrictive Covenants On May 14, 2019, Oregon Governor Kate Brown signed into law HB 2992, which, as of January 1, 2020, requires an employer to provide a terminated employee with a signed, written copy of his or her non-competition agreement within 30 days of his or her termination date. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
Hart v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
This is how Lessig explains the Supreme Court's decisions in Brown v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am
What is E. coli? [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
Furthermore, Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Pepper v Hart said that Article IX was ‘a provision of the highest constitutional importance’ which ‘should not be narrowly construed’. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
The first is to interpret the concept of freedom of speech according to its origins, which was, as Lord Browne-Wilkinson put it in Pepper v Hart ‘to discuss what they [Parliament], as opposed to the monarch, chose to have discussed’ (p 638). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 11:50 am
Hodges, or even Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:30 am
Hart’s general concept of law. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:35 pm
Eirik Bjorge (Univ. of Bristol - Law) & Cameron Miles (3 Verulam Buildings) have published Landmark Cases in Public International Law (Hart Publishing 2017). [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
R v Brown (1993)Jonathan Herring [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
In 1956, Ervin helped draft the Southern Manifesto denouncing Brown v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 10:00 am
R v Brown (1993)Jonathan Herring [read post]
