Search for: "BROWN v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Today, we’re doing something a little different, taking our cue from a recent New York state appellate decision: Brown & Brown, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm
The plan, directive or guidelines, as it were, should emanate from the higher echelons of the police department, sheriff or State Police. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:53 pm
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 12:17 am
The Neutrality Principle: The Hidden Yet Powerful Legal Axiom at Work in Brown Versus Board of Education by William Blake, University of Texas at Austin, and Hans Hacker, Arkansas State University, Department of Political Science, appeared in Berkeley Journal of African-American Law & Policy (2006). [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 5:01 pm
Brown v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:45 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:57 am
This lesson was learned in Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
This post concludes and summarizes our coverage of the case United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 1:01 pm
Specifically, the Court held that the City Council of Fremont violated the Brown Act by privately discussing a new policy promulgated by the city's police department. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Reed departed, without saying so, from rational basis review when the Court struck down a state law that gave preference to men when two parents sought to be executor of their son’s estate. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:02 pm
Under the United States Supreme Court decisions and our [State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
In Shoffner v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 10:51 am
State of Nebraska and Department of Education v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:27 am
Wade by seeking an abortion in another state, and the plaintiff-parents in Brown v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
13 Mar 2003, 3:17 pm
Read Brown v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 9:46 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 1148 (17 October 2008) Reinwood Ltd v L Brown & Sons Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1090 (17 October 2008) Environment Agency v Ellis [2008] EWCA Civ 1117 (17 October 2008) Noone, R (on the application of) v HMP Drake Hall & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 1097 (17 October 2008) Source: www.bailii.org.uk… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44]… [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
