Search for: "BUCK v. MILLER" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
Louisiana — the case which declared that Miller v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Still, there's one company in the news that's bucking the "golden parachute" trend: retailer J.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/OD6AI4 (@KevinOKeefe) Quinn Emanuel Partner Defending Samsung at Odds With Federal Judge - http://bit.ly/PsjynF (Amy Miller) Apple-Samsung Judge 'Livid' Over Document Disclosure - http://bit.ly/OwVyE6 (Charles Babcock) Apple Asks Court to Sanction Samsung - http://on.wsj.com/OwVqnW (Jessica Vascellaro, Ashby Jones) Apple v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
(forthcoming) Amicus brief of the American Legion Miller v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:48 am by Rumpole
(For the US view on forced sterilizations, and Oliver Wendell Holmes majority opinion that "three generations of imbeciles are enough" , check out Buck v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
In Huras v Primerica Financial Services Limited[13]an agreement on settlement was reached which provided small compensation to each member of the large group of class members.[14]  The settlement provided for additional compensation to be paid to the Ontario and British Columbia RPs – $3000 and $2000 respectively.[15]  By way of contract, in Sutherland, Justice Winkler disallowed a claim where the RP sought compensation for work related to the administration of the… [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 9:17 am by Moria Miller
Supreme Court 2003), challenging the constitutionality of lifetime disqualification of ex-offenders from employment; Buck v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Roper, 11-5005, a habeas case that had been relisted twice, and Buck v. [read post]