Search for: "BUCKLES v. STATE" Results 21 - 40 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2006, 7:50 am
State of Punjab, AIR 1955 SC 549, in law school. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:01 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
” Related articles by Zemanta Creation of False Blog and LinkedIn Account Targeting Utah Resident Supports Personal Jurisdiction in Utah — Buckles v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The general rule in the United States is that either there is a carve-out for the committee bringing suit on behalf of the entity, or there potentially is no coverage. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:27 pm
In representing a purchaser, developer or a developer/builder involved in a warranty dispute pertaining to a residence in the State of Florida, consider the Florida Supreme Court's most recent ruling concerning the scope and application of common law implied warranties in Maronda Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:43 pm
Of course the only way the state will be able to figure this out is by having a rollover accident of a bus without seat belts (and seeing how many children die) v. a rollover of a school bus with seat belts (and seeing how many children live). [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am by Joshua Matz
Capato and argues that “the Court was right to leave the Social Security question of parentage to the states, but the burden is now clearly on the states to clarify the rules. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 12:45 pm by Seth Davis
To my mind, the highlight was the filing of a petition by seventeen states in Case No. 22-1081, Ohio v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Like the testimony by Judge Lackey yesterday about not being able to go to the Mississippi Attorney General's Office because, he was told, Jim Hood had buckled to pressure from Dickie Scruggs to cooperate in Scruggs' mass Katrina settlement with State Farm that netted the $26.5 million in fees at the core of the Jones v. [read post]