Search for: "Back v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 45,917
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 1:21 am by Tessa Shepperson
Propertymark also guide tenants on knowing their rights where a pet is concerned, and they state:- England – Landlords cannot accept a higher deposit for having a pet, but they can charge you extra rent for having a pet. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am by Dan Farber
 The decision went further than even the Trump Administration had dared in rolling back environmental protections. [read post]
16 May 2024, 6:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The trial court granted summary judgment on this claim in favor of the State, but the Court of Appeals brings the case back, and unless the case settles, it looks like this case will proceed to trial.The case is Brandon v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:59 am by Tobin Admin
When asked to describe the impact, the employee stated, “[v]ery light, not harsh at all,” and said he hit the plaintiff with his shoulder. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
DeSantis said his state was pushing back against the global elite who want to force people to “eat bugs. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
In theory, we could go way back in time: townplanning regulations of medieval cities were already full of hygiene and sanitation stan-dards that can be considered pre-ecological. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am by Eric Goldman
As I wrote back in December, scraping claims are almost always about unwanted copying and distribution of data. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:45 am by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The Gomez Factors In laying out the facts of the case, the higher court noted that one case in particular, Gomez v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In addition, a Satisfaction of Judgment was filed on February 24,2021 stating that the Judgment was paid in full and the sum of $0.00 remains unpaid (NYSCEF Doc. [read post]