Search for: "Bailes v. Bailes" Results 21 - 40 of 2,284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 1:11 pm by Andrew Tidwell-Neal
  The court was to take in to consideration several things before making a bail determination, as well, like the nature of the crime committed and the potential danger posed by the arresstee, the criminal history of the arrestee and the substantiality of the government's evidence.The Supreme Court looked at the Bail Reform Act of 1984 in its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 8:55 am by Walter Olson
On the uncertain stance of constitutional law, see Pugh v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by David Post
[For a summary of the many studies in this area, see the Scholars' Amicus Brief in Vasquez v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 12:05 pm by Sara M. Mayo Vig
On July 18, 2023 the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its long anticipated ruling in Rowe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:11 pm by John Floyd
  Appeals Court Holds Sharing Bail Fees with Courts Violates Due Process   On August 29, 2019, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Caliste v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 3:51 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court Chief Justice, William Rehnquist in the 1987 decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 8:25 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Kenneth Grad (York University, Osgoode Hall Law School) has posted The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Bail Pending Appeal After R v Oland (Manitoba Law Journal, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:59 pm
Friday to Black’s application for bail (Black v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:59 pm
Denied bail by a divided Tenth Circuit Court, after that Court sitting en banc split 5-4 in reinstating his conviction, Nacchio is challenging the guilty verdict in a pending case awaiting the Justices’ action  (Nacchio v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 9:06 am by Adam Goodman
This past Wednesday (September 21, 2011), Justice Trotter of the Superior Court of Justice addressed this issue in R. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 6:20 am by SHG
  Apparently, County of Riverside v. [read post]