Search for: "Bailie v. State"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
And he also had the redoubtable Nathalie Lieven QC and David Blundell acting for EM (presumably pro bono, although this isn't stated). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
And he also had the redoubtable Nathalie Lieven QC and David Blundell acting for EM (presumably pro bono, although this isn't stated). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:54 am
Baber and Robert V. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
Toibb v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 3:28 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
Aliya Sharif v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 463 (on Lawtel, not on Baili yet) The issue on this appeal to the Court of Appeal was whether provision of two separate flats on the same floor of a building used as a hostel could be suitable as temporary accommodation for the applicant's household. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
Aliya Sharif v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 463 (on Lawtel, not on Baili yet) The issue on this appeal to the Court of Appeal was whether provision of two separate flats on the same floor of a building used as a hostel could be suitable as temporary accommodation for the applicant's household. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
One such case has landed on the NL virtual desk and, although not strictly housing related – being a business lease – it is an opportunity to remind ourselves of the criteria for wasted costs orders.Odihambo v Gooch Birmingham County Court, 24 October 2011 [Not available on Baili. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
One such case has landed on the NL virtual desk and, although not strictly housing related – being a business lease – it is an opportunity to remind ourselves of the criteria for wasted costs orders.Odihambo v Gooch Birmingham County Court, 24 October 2011 [Not available on Baili. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
