Search for: "Baine v. Baine"
Results 21 - 40
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Gordon College v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Nance v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:13 pm
Marko v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 10:23 am
Me.) in Baines v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 6:44 am
” Weitzman v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 1:25 am
Florence Foster Jenkins by G B Bain Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr Justice Meade) Martin and another v Kogan [2021] EWHC 1242 (IPEC) (19 May 2021)Florence Foster Jenkins seems to have been a rather good film about a less than good opera singer. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 8:17 am
v=RvV3nn_de2k Since 2001, LawLawLawTM has documented trends in technology, law (mostly patents and trademarks), baseball (mostly Red Sox), and music (mostly rock). [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Mary Cathedral v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Free Stream Media Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 7:00 am
In Bain v UBS (2018), the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that an investment banker was entitled to, in addition to other significant wrongful dismissal damages, $87,472 in vacation pay because UBS had not based Bain’s vacation pay on his overall compensation, including bonus, as it ought to have. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 7:00 am
In Bain v UBS (2018), the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that an investment banker was entitled to, in addition to other significant wrongful dismissal damages, $87,472 in vacation pay because UBS had not based Bain’s vacation pay on his overall compensation, including bonus, as it ought to have. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS LA Gem’s Motion on this issue. * Bain v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
To apply the doctrine of collateral estoppel, two requirements must be satisfied: “There must be an identity of issue which has necessarily been decided in the prior action and is decisive of the present action, and there must have been a full and fair opportunity to contest the decision now said to be controlling” (Buechel v Bain, 97 NY2d 295, 303-304 [2001]). [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 7:50 am
(Ian Millhiser, Vox) Bringing Down Obamacare (Anastasia Boden & Elizabeth Slattery, Dissed podcast) Amy Coney Barrett Could Bring Down Decades of Anti-Discrimination Law (Chiraag Bains, Slate) The Supreme Court could end home equity theft this upcoming term (Christina Martin, Pacific Legal Foundation) LGBT+ youth must not be treated as second-class citizens (Currey Cook, Openly) Impertinent Questions: The Unusual Case of Gorsuch v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm
In Sunderland Housing Corporation v Baines [2006] EWHC 2359 (QB), the claimants sought an interim injunction in libel, as well as under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, in respect of statements already published on a website. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm
The Queen in right of Alberta, 1971 CanLII 175 (SCC), [1972] S.C.R. 419; Bain v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
“[A] man of high ambitions … must face the loneliness of original work. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am
Further, the trust beneficiaries have no standing to sue regarding property that was in the trusts (see Matter of Larchmont Pancake House v Board of Assessors and/or Assessors of the Town of Mamaroneck, 33 NY3d 228, 240 [2019]; Buechel v Bain, 275 AD2d 65, 65 [1st Dept 2000]). [read post]
