Search for: "Baker v Barnett" Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm by Eric Rassbach and Hannah Smith
It follows then that just as a state could not forbid bakers from baking cakes to celebrate same-sex wedding ceremonies, a state cannot force a baker to bake a cake in order to celebrate one. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
The Department of Justice brief advances a similar argument and also argues that creative expression aside, the law must not force “participation in an expressive event” under First Amendment precedents such as Barnette v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Elina Saxena
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
How does one write about the civil rights movement and never mention Charles Hamilton Houston, Robert Carter, or Constance Baker Motley? [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
How does one write about the civil rights movement and never mention Charles Hamilton Houston, Robert Carter, or Constance Baker Motley? [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:01 am
As is to be expected, in her opinion, Judge Collyer relies heavily on the Supreme Court case of Smith v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am by Allison Trzop
Adler defends the law professors’ amicus brief that he signed, which challenges DOMA on federalism grounds; Ernie Young (in a post by Randy Barnett) does the same at the Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]