Search for: "Balle v. Carter" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2013, 8:35 am by Mark Graber
  Unions for all practical purposes enjoyed a forty year losing streak from 1895 (In re Debs) to 1936 (Carter v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am by Rob Robinson
Hedges -  http://bit.ly/Xyti9k (Catherine Kiernan) Failing to Circulate A Litigation Hold Does Not Warrant a Presumption of Gross Negligence – http://bit.ly/XBb46X (Dan Harshman) FTC’s New eDiscovery Rules in Effect as of November 9 2012 -  http://bit.ly/UABDTQ (Ryan Thomas) Hooters Law Suit Must Use Predictive Coding from Same Vendor – http://bit.ly/XxoDEG (Anna Biblowitz) Information Governance Even More Important In The Era Of Big Data – Forbes –… [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:14 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/Qnhy2Y (@OrangeLT) At the Very Least, Lawyers Better Understand the Basics of Social Media – Budget CLO Jason Romrell –http://bit.ly/RnHwX4 (@LXBN) Case in Point: “Bring Your Own Device” - http://bit.ly/Rxuc2u (Tom Fishburne) Craig Ball on Special Masters in eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/RxXwGf (@SharonNelsonEsq) Dropbox is Excellent Tool for Legal Collaboration, Google Alerts for Staying Up-To-Date… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:27 am by Ronald Collins
To that list he now adds his own judicial biography of the man who successfully argued Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(for now) – District Court C D California judgement in Carter Bryant v Mattel (Property, intangible) (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer’s Mind) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Golden – Plaintiff need not attach copyright registration to complaint: Golden v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:10 pm by Sandy Levinson
As everyone now knows, Elena Kagan is fully aware of this scandal, having written about it in a 1995 review of Steve Carter's The Confirmation Mess. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Mr William McCormick (Carter Ruck) for the claimant submitted the judgment of Millet LJ in Berkoff v Burchill that “The question, however, is how the words would be understood, not how they were meant, and that is pre-eminently for the jury”. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm by Robert Hougham
In Elton John v Guardian News & Media Ltd [2008] the High Court heard the claimants (in this case Elton John) submission that the use of innuendo in the spoof diary would have been understood to mean that Elton John had been insincere, dishonest or false in relation his fund raising activities associated with White Tie & Tiara Ball and his long standing commitment to the Elton John Aids Foundation (EJAF). [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:10 pm
Reversed and remanded.NFP civil opinions today (3): Ervin Mark Ball v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
The petitioners, Maryann Schultz and James Schultz (collectively hereinafter "the Schultzes"), seek reversal of the district court opinion granting Smoky Mountain Materials, Inc.'s ("Smoky") motion to dismiss, and Frank Carter's ("Carter") motion for summary judgment. [read post]