Search for: "Bank of Delaware v. Smith"
Results 21 - 40
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am
United States, which dealt with criminal bank fraud. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 6:07 am
Smith, and Kellie C. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v St. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Sama, and Jennifer Wieboldt, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Wednesday, July 11, 2018 Tags: Cross-border transactions, Morrison v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Kindred v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Musa Subasi (University of Maryland, College Park), on Sunday, April 1, 2018 Tags: Board communication, Boards of Directors, Decision making, Executive performance, Firm performance, Information environment, Management, Signaling, Social networks, Stock performance Disclosing Corporate Lobbying Posted by Timothy Smith, Walden Asset Management, and John Keenan, AFSCME, on Monday, April 2, 2018 … [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:09 am
Miller (University of Iowa College of Law), on Monday, February 26, 2018 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Buyouts, Delaware law, DGCL Section 102, Director liability, Duty of care, Fiduciary duties, In re Revlon, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
Last year also saw Delaware decisions that continue to change the landscape of M&A litigation and interesting developments in the area of SEC enforcement. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Community Bank of Raymore, 14-520, likewise scored a sixth relist. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
Although the rule insulates the decision makers from ordinary negligence,[7] it can typically be overcome by a showing of gross negligence.[8] States may differ in whether the rule applies to both directors and officers (e.g., Delaware[9]), only to directors (e.g., Florida[10]), or only to “outside” directors (e.g., California[11]). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
We would like to thank Reed Smith’s Kevin Hara for helping to put this together.Daimler AG v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
Pion, Pion, Johnston, Nerone, Girman, Clements & Smith, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendants. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:26 pm
SMITH and DIEBOLD INCORPORATED, Petitioners, v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
Samsung: Lack of Custodian Follow-Up+Failure to Suspend Auto-Deletion of Email=Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/MaaYhA (@LegalHoldPro) Who's Tweeting live from the Apple v Samsung trial? [read post]
