Search for: "Banning Company v. California" Results 21 - 40 of 1,153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2013, 3:53 pm
In the article, the national movement to eliminate discretion was examined along with California’s efforts on banning discretionary clauses. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:17 am by Phillip J. Eskenazi
After the federal law expired, several states, including California, enacted their own surcharge bans. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Supreme Court with an update on yesterday's oral argument in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Holly
  Regular consumers now enjoy a front-row seat to the long-running intellectual property dispute between Apple, the tech giant based in Cupertino, California, and Masimo, a medical device company based in Irvine, California. [read post]
6 Jan 2006, 3:16 pm
"The state of California has the right to ban cigarette giveaways to prevent youth smoking, the California Supreme Court recently ruled," reports JoinTogether.org here.You can read the opinion here.An interesting piece by Robert Spears, entitled "What Free v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm
Three months after four Democratic U.S. senators urged smartphone companies to ban the selling of mobile phone applications that reveal the location of DUI checkpoints, Apple recently caved, USA Today reports. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Further, even after recreational marijuana was legalized in the state in 2016, a 2018 California Supreme court ruling in Ross v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
North American Stainless, a retaliation ban limits case, stating that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a company can be sued for retaliation by terminating an employee's fiancée. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 10:15 pm by Cannabis Law Group
We could see this changing, especially because part because the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Ross v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:48 am by Marissa Miller
This weekend’s coverage of the Court concentrated on developments in the constitutional challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage, Fisher v. [read post]